A founder-first guide for PhDs, researchers, and scientists who want to turn academic research into a venture-fundable startup, and navigate the challenging but rewarding shift toward becoming a startup founder with a venture fundable deep tech startup.
You’ve made a scientific breakthrough — now what? For many New Zealand researchers, the path from lab bench to venture-backed startup is murky at best. This guide brings clarity to that journey. It’s built specifically for academics and deep tech inventors navigating the complex world of IP licensing, Pre Seed funding, university negotiations, and VC expectations.
From Science to Seed starts with the end in mind: a successful, venture-scale deep tech startup built in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Written by the team at Outset Ventures, the execution roadmap reverse-engineers that goal into practical, founder-ready steps you can act on — even before you’ve left the lab.
Built for aspiring deep tech founders in New Zealand — PhD students, university researchers, and science-led inventors exploring the path to startup formation.
What You’ll Get From This Page:
- A clear breakdown of what NZ deep tech VCs are really looking for
- How Outset Ventures funds spinouts at seed (with ownership benchmarks)
- How to frame scientific outputs as fundable traction
- Step-by-step support to go from research to raise
- Links to New Zealand universities, TTOs and deep tech support orgs
Quick Navigation
- What Deep Tech VCs Actually Want
- What Outset Invests In (at Seed)
- What Qualifies as Patentable IP
- Working with Your University Tech Transfer Office (TTO)
- What a TTO Does and How to Engage Them
- How to file an Invention Disclosure Form (IDF)
- Role of Your Principal Investigator (PI) in Approvals
- Typical Commercial Terms
- How to Secure Your Intent to Spin Out (while Protecting IP)
- What Investors Look For in Spinout Terms
- Negotiating from a Founder’s Perspective
- New Zealand Deep Tech Innovation Hubs & Commercialisation Departments
- Incubators & Accelerators for New Zealand Deep Tech Founders
- Coming in Month 2: What Counts as Deep Tech Traction?
Angus Blair
General Partner / Outset Ventures
As a specialist deep tech VC; my job and obsession is backing scientists and engineers the moment their research demands a company rather than a conference paper. Over the last five years I’ve helped build a portfolio from future food, advanced materials, aerospace, med-tech to fusion. Deploying $100k–$2m first cheques and following on through scale-up. This playbook distils the lessons (and battle-scars) of those deals into a pragmatic roadmap for spinning out breakthrough science in Aotearoa.
If you’re a researcher wrestling with IP clauses, term-sheets, or whether to be CEO, you’re exactly who I wrote this for. Dive in, and when you’re ready to talk capital, drop me a line.
Focus: Seed-stage investments in defensible science & engineering—think plasma physics, synthetic biology, next-gen energy, and beyond.
Track record: 25+ deep-tech investments, including New Zealand’s first funded fusion experiment and the world’s smallest MRI.
Why this guide exists: University inventors kept asking the same questions; this is the answer once, share many.
Connect: LinkedIn | outset.ventures
1. What Deep Tech VCs Actually Want
Deep tech venture capital is fundamentally different from software investing. While software VCs can take market risks and iterate quickly, deep tech VCs need a more disciplined approach due to the longer development cycles and higher capital requirements.
The Economics That Drive Everything
Venture capital operates on the Power Law: most investments fail, a few do okay, and one or two generate massive returns that make the entire fund profitable. For deep tech VCs, this math is even more extreme.
The brutal reality:
- 50-80% of deep tech companies will fail or go sideways.
- Of those that succeed, most will generate modest returns.
- Only 1-2 companies per fund will deliver the 30x+ returns needed to make the fund work.
This means deep tech VCs need each investment to have credible potential to return the fund.
It's not enough to build a good business – you need to build a business that could theoretically return an entire fund on its own.
Fund size matters: A $20M fund can get excited about a $100M exit. A $200M fund needs billion-dollar outcomes. Understanding your VC's fund size and return requirements is crucial for alignment.
The Core Trade-off
Because deep tech carries inherent technical risk – will the science actually work? Can you build what you're proposing? – most deep tech VCs compensate by minimising other types of risk:
- Market risk: We prefer obviously large markets over markets we need to convince ourselves about
- Team risk: We need technical founders with deep domain expertise, not just entrepreneurial ambition
- Capital risk: We want to see a clear path to follow-on funding and eventual exit
What This Means for Founders
Deep tech VCs are looking for the intersection of:
- Breakthrough technology that creates genuine competitive moats
- Massive market opportunities with clear paths to billion-dollar outcomes
- Technical founders who can navigate both the science and the business
- Capital-efficient milestones that systematically de-risk the path to scale
The bar is high because the stakes are high. Deep tech investments take longer, cost more, and have more binary outcomes. But when they work, they create the companies that reshape entire industries.
Know your VC: Not all funds play this game. Smaller funds can afford smaller outcomes, corporate VCs have different strategic motivations, and government funds may prioritise impact over returns. Understanding who you're working with and what success looks like for them is crucial for building the right partnership.
2. What Outset Invests In (at Seed)
At Outset, we focus on seed-stage deep tech companies where breakthrough science meets massive commercial opportunity. Our investment thesis is built around three non-negotiable pillars that work together to create investable propositions.
1. The Science Must Be Defensible | We're looking for sufficiently deep technology – not incremental improvements, but genuine scientific and engineering breakthroughs that create obvious technical moats.
This means: | • 80%+ R&D intensity at early rounds is expected, not concerning
• Technology that will be genuinely hard for competitors to replicate
• Clear IP ownership with teams capable of advancing the science beyond its origins
• High technical risk that we're comfortable underwriting because the payoff justifies it
We're not interested in applying existing technology to new markets. We want technology that fundamentally changes what's possible. |
2. The Market Opportunity Must Be Obvious | Because we're taking significant technical risk, we can't afford market risk.
We look for: | • Platform technologies with multiple commercial pathways, not single-use solutions
• Commodity disruption where your technology offers step-change advantages in cost, time, quality, or scale
• Market creation potential – technologies that don't just serve existing markets but create entirely new ones
The market opportunity should be self-evident, not something we need to convince ourselves about through extensive modeling. |
3. The Founders Must Be Technically Obsessed | We back technical founders with deep domain expertise, not entrepreneurial generalists who've stumbled into deep tech.
We look for: | • Domain obsession – founders who are genuinely passionate about solving specific technical problems, not just building startups
• Technical credibility through experience, advanced degrees, or demonstrable expertise in the relevant field
• Coachability around business building, because the technical timeline demands founders who can fundraise, hire, and communicate effectively
If technical expertise is missing from the founding team, it must be added through co-founders or early technical hires with meaningful equity stakes. |
Beyond Seed: What We Track
As companies mature, we closely monitor their ability to:
- Attract scarce technical talent from limited global pools
- Build commercial partnerships that validate R&D direction before revenue
- Secure follow-on capital from investors who understand deep tech timelines
- Execute against milestones that systematically de-risk the path to scale
Outset’s Investment Process
Every potential investment undergoes rigorous technical evaluation including founder interviews, site visits, independent technical deep dives with industry experts, and IP diligence. We're looking to make informed bets on breakthrough technologies with credible paths to billion-dollar outcomes.
The bar is high because the stakes are high. But when deep tech works, it creates the companies that reshape entire industries.
Outset Ventures — Launchpad for NZ’s Deep Tech Startups
Outset Ventures offers specialised lab and prototyping facilities for deep-tech and hardware startups, alongside early- to growth-stage investment for science-led ventures. Founded by the first wave of Kiwi innovators in deep tech. Founders can access physical infrastructure, expert support, and capital under one roof, making it a launchpad for NZ-based deep tech startups.
3. What Qualifies as Patentable IP (Think Globally, not Locally)
As a New Zealand researcher and founder, you need to think internationally about patents from day one. Why? Because your key markets, acquirers, and competitors are likely overseas. IP strategy is specialised work, we encourage all of our startups to work with specialist (like our friend Tim Stirrup from Prime Innovation).
The patent rules that matter most are those in your target markets and where you will manufacture - typically the US, Europe, and China.
Universal Patent Criteria (applies almost everywhere):
Novelty | Your invention must be new globally. A publication anywhere, in any language, can destroy novelty |
Inventive step/Non-obviousness | It can't be an obvious next step to experts in your field |
Industrial applicability/Utility | It must have practical use |
Patentable subject matter | This is where countries differ most |
What's Typically NOT Patentable (with Important Variations):
Abstract ideas and natural phenomena | Universal exclusion |
Business methods | Largely excluded globally |
Medical treatment methods | Excluded in most countries except the US (devices and drugs are fine everywhere) |
Critical Differences that Affect your Strategy:
Grace periods | The US and Australia offer 12-month grace periods for your own disclosures; Europe, China, and NZ do not |
Software patents | Much easier in the US if framed as technical improvements |
First-to-file | Universal now, but prosecution strategies vary significantly |
Why this matters for NZ startups: An NZ patent application is often just a priority placeholder. The real value comes from protection in your commercial markets. A granted NZ patent in a country with 5 million people won't excite investors or stop international competitors. Therefore consider filing like this:
Practical approach:
- File your provisional in Australia (better search facilities) or NZ (if simple/cheap)
- Think globally about claims - will they work in the US? Europe? China?
- Raise money for the big markets - US, Europe, China, Japan typically matter more than NZ
- Get advice from firms with international experience - NZ-only patent expertise isn't enough
Remember: You're not building a NZ company that happens to export. You're building a global company that happens to be based in NZ. Your IP strategy should reflect this from the start.
4: Working with Your University Tech Transfer Office (TTO)
What a TTO Does and How to Engage Them
Your university's Technology Transfer Office (TTO) bridges academic research and commercial application. These organisations, listed below, manage how university discoveries become real-world products and services.
TTOs handle five core functions:
- IP protection – Filing patents, managing portfolios, and protecting discoveries
- Market assessment – Evaluating commercial potential and identifying pathways to market
- Deal-making – Negotiating licences with companies and structuring spin-out agreements
- Company formation – Supporting new ventures based on university research
- Industry networking – Connecting researchers with partners, investors, and customers
Start engaging your TTO before publishing anything with commercial potential. Book an introductory meeting to understand their processes and timelines. Most TTOs welcome proactive researchers—it simplifies their work and improves commercialisation outcomes.
How to file an Invention Disclosure Form (IDF)
The Invention Disclosure Form starts your formal commercialisation journey. This document captures your invention's key details and helps the TTO assess its potential.
Submit your IDF 3+ months before any public disclosure. TTOs need time to assess patentability, search prior art, and file provisional patents. Remember: in most countries, public disclosure before patent filing destroys patent rights.
Role of Your Principal Investigator (PI) in Approvals
For PhD students and postdocs, your PI holds significant influence over commercialisation. University IP policies typically require PI approval for any commercial use of lab research.
Your PI's responsibilities include:
- Endorsing the IDF – Confirming accuracy and supporting commercialisation
- Structuring ongoing research – Defining how the spin-out and lab will collaborate
- Managing conflicts – Ensuring commercial activities don't compromise academic duties
- Choosing involvement level – Some become co-founders; others remain advisers or stay hands-off
Discuss your commercialisation plans with your PI early. Some actively encourage entrepreneurship; others worry about distraction from research. Understanding their position helps you find a mutually beneficial path forward. In general, if a professor wants to be a co-founder but not leave to join the venture full time, it is important they don’t retain significant ownership. Best practice is 5% which should be vested with agreed ongoing contribution to the venture.
What NZ University TTOs Usually Require Before Licensing
New Zealand universities set specific requirements before licensing IP to spin-outs:
Business fundamentals:
- Credible business plan demonstrating market need
- Capable management team (often requiring external expertise)
- Development roadmap to market
- Funding strategy and financial projections
These requirements can often be well in excess of what a venture capitalist will require to back you. Its worth remember that you get a lot of moral authority from bringing money to the table which can shortcut a lot of these requirements and improve your negotiating position.
IP Ownership Pathway: Universities increasingly include IP assignment triggers:
- Significant funding round (typically Series A or $5m+ rounds)
- Revenue milestones
- Time-based transfer (often 3–5 years)
Ongoing Relationships:
- Research agreements for continued university work help
- Facility access during transition
- Publication rights balancing academic and commercial needs
Typical Commercial Terms
- Equity: 10–25% is standard, though ranges from 1–49% exist in the market. You’ll notice a tension here with investors who are typically looking for 10% or less.
- Royalties: Single-digit percentages (ideally under 5%) with caps
- Upfront fees: Usually minimal to preserve early-stage capital
- Milestone payments: Linked to commercial, not technical, achievements
How to Secure Your Intent to Spin Out (and Protect IP in the Meantime)
Declaring spin-out intentions whilst protecting IP requires strategic planning:
Step 1 | Early Declaration
| Inform your TTO when you're seriously considering a spin-out—even months before company formation. This allows them to:
• Prioritise your IP protection
• Stop marketing to other licensees
• Draft spin-out-friendly terms
• Plan around critical deadlines |
Step 2 | Protection Strategies | • File provisionals quickly – Most NZ deep tech companies file in Australia first for their provisional search service (AUD $1,100 extra), providing early patentability insights
• Coordinate publications – File patents before any public disclosure
• Document development – Detailed records support future filings
• Control information – Use NDAs with potential co-founders, advisers, and investors |
Step 3 | Formal Commitments
| Request a letter of intent or option agreement that:
• Confirms exclusive negotiation with your spin-out
• Sets negotiation timeline (typically 3–6 months)
• Outlines key terms to prevent surprises
• May transfer ongoing IP costs to the company |
Step 4 | Building Positive Relationships | • Share your funding timeline and milestones openly
• Propose contract research benefiting both parties
• Highlight how the spin-out supports university impact goals
• Maintain research collaborations where possible |
Remember: TTOs generally support spin-outs as they bring committed founders and validated commercialisation paths. However, they must protect university interests and justify public research investments. Understanding both perspectives creates agreements that launch successful companies whilst maintaining valuable university relationships.
Insider Tip: I have seen the best success for founders who negotiate on an “arms length” basis. This means not relying on the TTO to help with company formation. But rather starting the company yourself and negotiating with the TTO for a license on a purely commercial basis.
5: What Investors Look For in Spinout Terms
Q: What licensing terms make a spinout investable?
Q: How much equity should universities take in spinouts?
6: Negotiating From a Founder's Perspective
Q: Who should lead spinout negotiations - founders or investors?
Q: What's a fair value exchange between universities and founders?
7. New Zealand Deep Tech Innovation Hubs & Commercialisation Departments
Working on university-based research? Start Here
Your commercialisation office is your first stop. They manage access to IP, PreSeed project funding, and support through the Commercialisation Partner Network (CPN).
KiwiNet — Kiwi Innovation Network
KiwiNet connects cutting-edge research with commercialisation support, helping science-backed startups access funding, expertise, and pathways to market across Aotearoa.
Return on Science (& Momentum)
https://www.returnonscience.co.nz/
https://www.returnonscience.co.nz/momentum
Momentum and Return On Science run investment committees of students and experts who give free feedback on science-based startup ideas.
Incubators & Accelerators for New Zealand Deep Tech Founders
Org & Program | Description | Next Step Link | Upfront Investment? | Vertical (Primary) | Program Type |
WNT Ventures
(Callaghan Technology Incubator) | Deep-tech incubator investing in IP-rich startups. | ✅ | Deep Tech | Gov-funded VC Extension (Callaghan Tech Incubator) | |
Bridgewest Ventures
(Callaghan Technology Incubator) | Deep-tech incubator commercialising breakthrough research. | ✅ | Deep Tech | Gov-funded VC Extension (Callaghan Tech Incubator) | |
Pacific Channel
(Callaghan Technology Incubator) | Deep-tech incubator commercialising breakthrough research. | ✅ | Deep Tech | Gov-funded VC Extension (Callaghan Tech Incubator) | |
Brandon Capital
(Callaghan Technology Incubator) | Deep-tech incubator commercialising breakthrough research. | ✅ | Deep Tech | Gov-funded VC Extension (Callaghan Tech Incubator) | |
Germinate by Sprout | 7-week program for researchers to turn their ideas into commercial opportunities. | 🚫 | Deep Tech | Incubator (Cohort-based) | |
Sprout Accelerator | Three month accelerator advancing food system innovators to grow groundbreaking startups. | 🚫 | AgTech | Cohort-based Accelerator | |
KiwiNet (PreSeed Accelerator Fund) | National network helping commercialise public research into startup ventures. Provides proof-of-concept funding and expert support. | 🚫 | Deep Tech | Ongoing Support Program (Non-cohort) | |
Blackbird- Foundry | Pre-accelerator for university-affiliated deep tech startups, offering mentorship and a $5K pitch prize. | 🚫 | Deep Tech | Cohort-Based Pre-Accelerator |
NZ Deep Tech Commercialisation Departments
AUT Ventures — Auckland University of Technology
https://www.aut.ac.nz/ventures
AUT’s commercialisation arm, connecting research with global partners, startups, and investors.
Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship (CIE) – University of Auckland
https://www.cie.auckland.ac.nz
Free suite of startup programmes, events, and incubators — from early ideation to venture scaling. Includes co-working space, startup grants, product development sprints, and tailored Māori and Pasifika initiatives.
UniServices — University of Auckland
https://www.uniservices.co.nz/
University of Auckland’s research commercialisation arm, advancing innovations from lab to market globally.
WaikatoLink — University of Waikato
https://www.waikatolink.co.nz/
The commercialisation company of the University of Waikato, bridging research with business to create impact-driven ventures.
Massey Ventures — Massey University
https://www.masseyventures.co.nz/
Supports the commercialisation of Massey University’s research, fostering innovation and entrepreneurship.
Lincoln Agritech — Lincoln University
https://www.lincolnagritech.co.nz/
A research and development company owned by Lincoln University, focusing on innovative solutions in agriculture and environmental sciences.
Wellington UniVentures — Victoria University of Wellington
https://www.wellingtonuniventures.nz/
The university's commercialisation office, working with researchers to advance ground-breaking ideas and inventions.
Center for Entrepreneurship (UCE) — University of Canterbury
Offers programs like the Summer Startup Program to help students transform ideas into impactful ventures.
Research and Enterprise — University of Otago
Facilitates the translation of research discoveries into beneficial products and services.
Coming in Month 2- What Counts as Deep Tech Traction?
Deep Tech Rounds, Funding Types, and Founder Ownership
Deep tech startups often have longer development timelines, heavier research requirements, and slower paths to revenue than typical software or consumer startups. This means your funding journey will look different—and understanding how investment stages, funding types, and ownership evolve over time is crucial. This guide walks through how deep tech startups are typically funded at each stage, what types of capital are available, and what happens to founder ownership along the way.
Outset Ventures
Champion of Deep Technology Founders in Aotearoa New Zealand.
Outset's mission is to bring New Zealand’s deep technology innovations to the world stage by helping founders turn unique science and engineering-based ideas into companies that deliver real-world solutions on a global scale.
We are New Zealand’s only technology incubator with flexible laboratory and workshop facilities designed to support the development of early-stage, deep technology start-ups.
We have a 20+ year history of technology commercialisation on-site, with notable alumni including Rocket Lab, LanzaTech and Mint Innovation.
Our unique facilities and extensive experience as founders mean we offer an unparalleled investment opportunity to back credible, innovative founders operating on the forefront of new industries.
Hello@outset.ventures